≡ Menu

Selecting Quality Research Sources for the Classroom

Part 3 of 4 in a series By CUE guest blog editor Jane Lofton

– by Tasha Bergson-Michelson

Research sourcesWhen we consider information quality — teaching students to find and use credible information — educators often feel they must take sides with regard to what type of search tool they prefer. Should students be required to use information in paid databases, such as Facts on File, EBSCO, ProQuest, or Gale? Or is it better to accustom them to the open web, especially via search engines such as Google, Sweet Search, or DuckDuckGo?

In actuality, this debate sets up a false dichotomy.

Certainly, there are times I would prefer one category over the other. In daily life, as well as in the type of “authentic” assignments we strive for these days, there are many information needs that simply require the open web. Furthermore, one of the most insidious pro-fee-database arguments I encounter is that using databases “guarantees” “quality” or “reliable” information, without regard for the fact that the range of sources in databases is often quite broad, and students are as likely to encounter articles from People or Good Housekeeping in some academic databases as they are to find an article from the Journal of Microbiology.

And even our “quality” research sources sometimes retract information due to mistakes, falsification, and so on. Telling our students that there is a clear-cut road to the truth is not the way to nurture a society of critical thinkers. I have even seen certain educators try to assure “quality” by requiring students as young as middle school to use databases of peer-reviewed articles, when I know that it is a struggle to read these articles, even for my upper-grade high school students. Frequently, high caliber, accessible web pages would be vastly more accessible and preferable.

On the flip side, many oft-cited educational websites aimed at elementary students, in their attempts to be accessible to early readers, fail to provide depth of information. Younger students often express frustration and feel talked down to; just because they cannot read at a high level does not mean they cannot think. Students are able to find longer, meatier articles in age-appropriate databases.

Similarly, my high school students may have trouble when they turn to Wikipedia first; it is a research source I love and encourage them to use under the right circumstances, but want them to avoid when it will create more work or confusion. One attribute of the wiki style is forgoing inline definitions of unfamiliar terms in favor of hyperlinking to the wiki page on the topic requiring definition. After several students arrived at my office in tears, with dozens of tabs open to different Wikipedia pages in an attempt to decode the first paragraph of the article on the Qizilbash, our library instituted a practice of starting Islamic empire research in our database encyclopedia collections.

Students also frequently become frustrated trying to get a summary of contemporary revolutions in a crowdsourced format. People are living these events, adding to the articles as history is made, leading to entries that are equivalent in length to 80 or 100 print pages. In an instance like this, we encourage students to start with a few succinct newspaper articles instead, whether from the open web or a paid database.

And this is the crux of the decision, not what search tool you need, but what variety of evidence or information you need, found through what variety of sources? Through my work in a range of information-seeking environments — including school libraries, corporate libraries, and as Google’s Search educator — I’ve come to believe that the choice is not so much about which kind of assignment should use a search engine and which a database. It is more about understanding what kinds of sources each holds and being able to think critically about the variety of sources one hopes students will access in the process of answering a given question. It is not about the single thing you are going to find, but the span of items and the expertise you build in moving among different search tools to get you there.

Let’s look at a specific example. Our world history students wrap up their 9th grade year by analyzing a film for its historical veracity. For example, a student who watches the World War I movie War Horse might analyze the uses and prevalence of barbed wire after seeing a horse in the film get caught on a fence, or a Schindler’s List watcher may learn more about train timetables in Nazi Germany. The classroom teacher asked me to help them get beyond “just Googling something” and “taking whatever is in the first hit as a complete answer.”

Since I do believe in Googling with intentionality (we should not “just” Google), we focused on what happens after that first “fishing” search. I had heard complaints that Downton Abbey is historically inaccurate, and — through background reading — found that one critique posed on the blogosphere was that the men of the early seasons were insufficiently whiskery. I gave students excerpts from the news articles, blog posts, and forum discussions I’d found in preliminary searches and asked them to use them as stepping stones sources: plumbing the language used by the authors for ideas about how to move their research forward. The flip reference in The Guardian to the characters failing the “military mustache test” reminded us, for example, that we could look to military sources to help explain the societal standards for facial hair at the time.

Students brainstormed two lists, inspired by the stepping stone sources and their own experience: search terms that might be helpful and types of sources that might offer appropriate evidence. Next, as a class, we created a web, matching types of sources to terms that might actually be used in those particular sources. [See Figure 1]

search brainstorm

Figure 1

Scholarly articles tend to be on very esoteric topics, such as the history of facial hair in Victorian and Edwardian times. Database search terms like:

[victorian OR edwardian], [“facial hair” OR mustaches OR beards OR “clean-shaven”] yielded fantastic articles on the transition from facial hair to physique as a symbol of masculinity in the late 1800s, focusing on the rise of “muscular Christianity” and the modern Olympics, as well as surveys counting the appearance of facial hair in illustrated newspapers over a 100-year period.1 On the other hand, none of the terminology related to facial hair proved helpful when we wanted to find archival photographs of soldiers from WWI. Instead, we had success finding those when we searched the open web with terms like:

[military OR soldier], [wwi], [british] and [museum OR archives OR collection OR library]

Ultimately, the advantage of employing both open web searching and fee databases lies in how we understand the purpose of sources and evidence. Many of us grew up learning about triangulation: proving something is true based on finding it in three places. The practice of triangulation is much harder now, when copying and pasting has become so much easier and hyperlinking so effortless. I prefer that students look to triangulate by providing multiple forms of evidence that suggest something is true. Ideally, they should be asking questions that don’t have simple look-it-up-and-plug-it-in answers, anyway, but ones that require synthetic thought to reach a conclusion. In these cases, having three different sources that say the exact same things is not as desirable an outcome of the search process, anyway. So, knowing how to find a more scholarly piece of writing (be it an encyclopedia entry or a scholarly paper) and also a primary source or two that add up to the answer students are pursuing is a powerful skill, indeed.

Unfortunately, there aren’t easy answers or quick shortcuts to acquiring these skills. It takes lots of practice and lots of support from instructors skilled in these activities. But if we really care — as we should — about students learning to manage a world of half-truths and misinformation, then it is imperative that they learn how make use of a variety of sources, drawn from a variety of tools, to strive for a realistic picture of the world around them. Along with their classroom teachers, students need teacher librarians, the instructors who specialize in information literacy skills, to provide them with access to a rich collection of both open web and fee-based resources and to instruct and support them in how to navigate, evaluate, and use information in a manner that will allow them to engage fully and effectively with the world around them.

1. Robinson, Dwight E. “Fashions in shaving and trimming of the beard: The men of the illustrated london news, 1842-1972.” American Journal of Sociology(1976): 1133-1141.
Oldstone-Moore, Christopher. “The beard movement in Victorian Britain.”Victorian Studies 48.1 (2005): 7-34.

About the author:

Tasha BergTasha Bergson-Michelsonson-Michelson is the Instructional and Programming Librarian for Castilleja School in Palo Alto, CA. Since 1995, Tasha has been exploring what makes for successful information literacy instruction in corporate, non-profit, subscription, and school libraries, and through after school programs and summer camps. Most recently, Tasha was the Search Educator at Google, where she wrote an extensive series of Search education lesson plans, the Power Searching MOOCs, and – most importantly – collaborated with other educators around the world to explore the most effective ways of teaching research skills. Tasha was recently designated a 2014 Mover & Shaker – Tech Leader by Library Journal.

Part 2 of 4 in a series By CUE guest blog editor Jane Lofton

Mark Archon

The arrival of the new California Standards has truly transformed the landscape of education in California as schools make substantial changes to create learning environments and lessons which foster student collaboration, require critical thinking and develop self-direction.

Change just ahead - California StandardsTechnology and digital literacy skills play ever-increasing roles in these learning environments, yet the State of California never adopted separate standards for technology. To address this gap, the Fresno County Office of education (FCOE), in a pioneering effort led by the then-region VII CTAP Director Emy Lopez Phillips, developed a Tech Skills flow chart identifying digital literacy and technology skills supporting the new California Standards for K-12. This resource aggregated the technology recommendations from the Partnership for 21st Century Learning (P21), the ISTE Standards for students, and standards associated with the Massachusetts Department of Education. It has been used by countless educators in California and beyond. Long Beach Unified (LBUSD) has adapted the FCOE tool and taken it a step further, aligning technology and digital literacy skills with the new California Standards and developing a scope and sequence for technology integration by grade level. Both the FCOE and LBUSD documents are readily available for educators. Take advantage of them to help ensure student technology proficiency through the grades.

For many teachers, teaching the new standards, along with technology and digital literacy skills, represents a dramatic shift. This shift includes a change in role, resources, and skills necessary for success.

First, the role as an educator is migrating from teacher to a facilitator of learning. Creating inquiry-based lessons which allow students to explore, research, collaborate and create products to demonstrate learning requires a substantial shift in how the teacher interacts with the curriculum and his or her students.

Secondly, the resources that teachers need are quite different from those in the textbook-driven approach commonly used under the former assessment system. A multitude of resources online and in print, technologies, and engagement strategies become the focal point of these new lessons. open educational resources, a plethora of web resources, publisher-generated resources, as well as home-grown lessons and collaborations between peers are all welcome additions in this new educational landscape.

Finally, the lesson design and delivery skills necessary for exemplary standards implementation are varied and many. These include team teaching, peer collaboration, facilitating student engagement, classroom management, proficiency with technology, and an understanding of universal Design for Learning, to name only a few. Ongoing job-embedded professional learning for all teachers and administrators is essential to ensure teachers are learning and using current research-based practices their students need.

Districts and school have spent a tremendous amount of time, energy, and fiscal resources in the past few years to prepare teachers and administrators for this change.

In Fresno County, for example, we see many districts hiring additional staff to provide professional learning for teachers. Titles for these new positions include technology coach, academic coach, or a teacher on special assignment (TOSA). A clear job description is an imperative part of these new teacher support roles, yet not all schools and districts have these in place. What are the expectations for these support positions? How are teachers perceiving them? Will the new support staff coach all teachers, or will a teacher interpret being coached as being an under performer? Are the conversations between coach and coachee confidential? So many questions surface in a school when a support position does not have a clearly defined role. District and site leaders will want to define roles carefully to avoid such problems.

While some schools are hiring coaches, other schools and districts are seeing the value of  hiring and using their Teacher Librarians (TL) to provide curricular and information / digital literacy support. TLs are strong facilitators of technology integration in support of student learning goals. The role of a TL is quite unique as teacher credentials are concerned. While technically still a teacher who is charged with instructing students, a TL also is versed in information literacy, digital literacy, and digital citizenship skills that correlate perfectly with the needs of 21st Century learners.

changing gears with California StandardsWe live in a world in which so many questions can be answered by a Google or other search engine query, and yet too few students are versed in information and digital literacy. TLs are uniquely prepared to instruct students and provide professional learning to staff on effective research and collaboration skills. If our intent is to prepare students for college and career, then helping them become information literate must be a non-negotiable within the K-12 environment, and this instruction must not be something that begins only at the secondary level. It is disheartening to know that California ranks dead last in the nation in ratio of students to TLs, leaving most of our students with the inequity of lacking access to the very instructor best versed in teaching these skills. Perhaps the advent of the new California Standards and the dire need to nurture digital and information literacy in all students will help bring awareness to the need for TLs in all schools.

Of course emphasizing the skills that TLs possess is not meant to imply that technology coaches or TOSAs are not adept at providing support in curriculum and information and digital literacy support, but rather that it is the Teacher Librarian that has a credential specifically identifying these as well as other skills. Moreover, as Petaluma High School Teacher Librarian Connie Williams explains in KnowledgeQuest:

The presence – on staff – of a dynamic school librarian with support staff has been proven by 21+ state studies to positively affect student achievement by encouraging co-teaching and learning that teaches students how to effectively work in today’s information environment. Skills required by Common Core such as independent learning, reading for, and writing with evidence, creating presentations, and researching effectively are necessary skills that cross all subjects.”

The linchpin behind all successful structures to support effective learning environments is the site leader. This person leads the vision for his or her school and ensures system alignment with clearly identified goals. This person provides a supportive environment so that teachers establish high standards for teaching and learning for one another and for all students. So I will finish with a question:

How might site and district leaders best leverage all available resources to ensure that teachers have appropriate access to necessary support as they navigate these new standards?

Share your thoughts by contributing to the comments.

About the author:

Mark ArchonMark Archon has been in the field of education for 25 years. During this time he was a middle school science teacher for five years and a site administrator for 12 years at the middle school level. He spent several years working for the Madera County Office of Education as the Director of Administrative Leadership Services providing professional development for educators in Region 7. He currently works for the Fresno County Office of Education as the Director of Instructional Technology Services.

Mark has been married to his wife Holly for 19 years and has two daughters: Alexi, 14 and Emily, 11.

CSLA Information Literacy Summit at CUE 2015

Part 1 of 4 in a series By CUE guest blog editor Jane Lofton While so many concepts have transformed meaning with the advent of the information age, this 1989 statement from the American Library Association Presidential Committee on Information Literacy still holds: “Ultimately, information literate people are those who have learned how to learn.” Information literacy - the Read More

Meet CUE Blog Guest Editor, Jane Lofton

CUE Guest Blog Editors We have reached out to several leaders from within our community and asked them to bring their perspective to the CUE Blog. Over several months, they’ll be inviting contributors and adding their own special spin to our beloved blog. Meet Jane: Jane Lofton is the Teacher Librarian at Mira Costa High Read More

How Does Twitter Impact New Teachers?

Part 5 of 5 in a series By CUE guest blog editor Doug Robertson I worry that Twitter can be bad for new teachers.  Twitter is a barrage of information, often good, more often conflicting, even more often amplified to the point of deafening. There can be little subtlety on twitter, and I believe teaching lives and dies on Read More

You’ve Gotta Hand It To Them – Using Educational Technology

Part 4 of 5 in a series by CUE guest blog editor Doug Robertson We have all been there, your students are totally unmotivated to learn and you have tried all the tricks in your secret teacher toolbox to make them engaged. Then, your district or board rolls out another new educational technology tool or policy. How Read More

Media Literacy 101

Part 3 of 5 in a series by CUE guest blog editor Doug Robertson Studies have shown that by 2015, the average American will consume over fifteen hours of media each day, not counting work time. This sounds impossible, but media researchers count the times that we are actually using more than one medium at a time. You Read More

What We Want for Ourselves We Should Want for Our Students

Part 2 of 5 in a series by CUE guest blog editor Doug Robertson As teachers we often feel like our power is being usurped by forces outside of our classrooms, forces that seem to be constantly telling us what to teach, how to teach, when to teach, and how to best reach the students in front of Read More

Teachers vs. Technology

Part 1 of 5 in a series By CUE guest blog editor Doug Robertson Teachers who are comfortable with technology, who use it regularly in class, who know the ways to get students to learn effectively (read: not “Open this app. Now do the thing.) are not the majority. We, the computer-using teachers, are the minority in our schools Read More

Introducing Doug Robertson, guest blog editor

CUE Guest Blog Editors We have reached out to several leaders from within our community and asked them to bring their perspective to the CUE Blog. Over several months, they’ll be inviting contributors and adding their own special spin to our beloved blog. CUE gets “Weird” For the next month, Doug Robertson, better known as Read More